European Axis of Evil

Just few days ago, France became the first country to enshrine right to abortion into its constitution. This is a major step in further descent of West into the hell, coming on top of the immigration, moral relativity and other anti-human policies.

This is nothing new, however. Since the end of the Middle Ages, it seems that all truly evil ideas had come from this area of Europe. France led the way by establishing alliance with Ottoman Empire in 1536, and this alliance lasted all the way to 1798.

All Atlantic European countries engaged in colonialism – unless they themselves had been colonized. Portugal, Spain, France, England, Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden all had colonies. But Iberian colonialism was much more humane. Spanish and Portuguese were open to race mixing in the colonies, incorporated natives into the aristocracy, and protected the native population from slavery. Ironically, this humanism and openness would be their doom: multiethnic societies are inherently dysfunctional, and as a result, Spain and Portugal were unable to extract any real value from their colonies once the gold had dried up. This then allowed Britain, France and Netherlands to quickly surpass them, as all three countries had colonized relatively empty land which could then be settled by European colonists and developed ground-up. Because of this, Britain and France would quickly rise to predominance in global politics, to be joined by Germany once it had united. And these three countries would proceed to shape the world as we know it.

It started, ironically, in North America. British and French squabbles over colonies would force the former to raise taxes, which were despised by the locals. This in turn would lead to the American Revolution. While rebels were determined, their victory was only made possible by heavy French support: France engaged Britain on the sea and land, and sent supplies, money, troops and naval support to the rebels. The French Navy transported reinforcements, fought off the Royal Navy and protected Washington’s forces in Virginia. Spain and Netherlands also played important, if lesser, role. But France would not profit from the peace settlement, and had only losses to count, having accumulated 1 billion livres in debt. United States would return the favor by inspiring the French Revolution, which would topple the Ancien Regime and throw the entire Europe into 23 years of uninterrupted bloody warfare. But the worst was yet to come.

French Revolution’s greatest evil was not the wars it had caused. Rather, it was the political progress it led to. French Revolution spread the idea of nationalism – the idea that each ethnicity should have its own country. While this is not evil and by itself, it had massive consequences for the future. Germany, previously disunited into dozens of princedoms, began the process of unification. This would eventually lead to the Franco-Prussian war, which France lost rather decisively. Result of this and the prolonged defense of Paris by worker militias was the Paris Commune. Paris Commune organized its own progressive society of self-styled socialism, in which people suffering from various mental ilnesses – such as feminism, socialism, communism – demanded their insanity to be spread outside. Commune was crushed after two months, but its virus survived.

Paris Commune would later give way to communism. Specifically, it would inspire everybody’s basement dwelling psychopath – Karl Marx. Marx and Engels would describe the Commune as the first example of the “dictatorship of the proletariat”, an ideal that would proceed to lead to deaths of the millions.

For some time, nothing would come of it. Revolutions were crushed, much like in 1848. But the German hunger for colonies and Anglo-French determination to defend them caused First World War in 1914 (though it was not the only cause). This mass slaughter on the account of human greed would change the world forever. Germany, increasingly desperate, allowed another idealist of questionable mental capacity to go to his native Russia. Said idealist, Vladimir Lenin, would create the first socialist country there – the Soviet Union.

And this rural, backwards version of socialism – more widely known as Communism – would proceed to have major consequences itself. War-torn Europe was justifiably afraid of Soviet invasion, and at the same time there existed major disillusionment with the old order. This would combine to produce new versions of socialism as a counterweight to Soviet communism. In Italy, native socialism would coagulate into fascism, while Germany would develop the national socialism – nazism for short. All this new socialism would lead to the Second World War.

While nazism and fascism were defeated, socialism itself managed to escape unscathed – attention was on nationalist aspects of these ideologies, and thus socialism remained free to infiltrate and destroy societies from within. Modern-day progressivism is in fact a deliberately warped and corrupted variant of Marxism, and in Europe its most fertile ground was found in Scandinavia as well as in the old breeding grounds of insanity – United Kingdom, Germany and France, this time joined by Portugal and Spain as well.

2 Comments

  1. Think you could elaborate on “France led the way by establishing alliance with Ottoman Empire in 1536”? Why did they form the alliance, also related what do you know about/think about the 1853 Crimean war where Western Christians sided with Ottomans against Eastern Orthodox?

    Like

    1. France established alliance with the Ottomans essentially because they feared Habsburgs. Habsburgs had acquired Spain in 1469, obviously already had the Holy Roman Empire, and had acquired Hungary and Croatia in 1527, after the Battle of Mohacs in 1526 destroyed the old Hungaro-Croatian kingdom. Essentially, French felt surrounded by Habsburg on all sides, and decided to ally with Ottomans as a counterweight (Ottomans were no threat to them, but were regularly fighting Habsburg Austria and Spain).

      As for the Crimean War, that was a quite different situation, albeit similar in some ways. Basically, West feared what Russia will do should it gain the control of the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, and thus did their best to prevent it. And you can see how geography determines strategy, because the exact same concern is what prompted United States and Germany to allow Turkey into NATO – a very stupid idea, but West was never really known for its long-term strategic thought.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment